Posts Mentioning RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Rob Fay 9:07 am on 2/7/2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Apple Home Page Search 

    Apple Home Page Search

    This morning I went to the Apple home page to find one of their commercials. I went to search and noticed that the behavior mimicked Apple’s own operating system and the “suggest” features available in browser search boxes. What I liked is that it not only offered suggested terms but displayed media previews along with the term. I realize this isn’t especially groundbreaking, given the amount of AJAX development in recent years. However, it reminded me that as Peter Morville analyzes search patterns, another to add to the list is the behavior of providing suggestions before a user has even executed a search. This might remedy the need to distinguish between a basic and advanced search, or the need to revise a search after seeing results. Notice the screen capture image (click image to see original) where I entered “ads” as my search term.

    Tags: [, , , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 11:30 am on 1/24/2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Edward Tufte iPhone Critique 

    Edward Tufte offers a critique of the iPhone’s interface design (includes video).

    Tags: [, , , , , , , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 1:41 pm on 1/17/2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Apple Ad Blurs Old and New Media 

    An inspiring ad in today’s New York Times.

    Click play and see how the lines between old media (NYTimes ‘paper’ style view of front page) and new mix together beautifully.

    In case the ad moves, I tried to do a screen capture of it, but the voice is lost. Just focus on the ad and the paper’s headline.

    Tags: [, , , , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 7:20 pm on 1/29/2007 Permalink | Reply  

    iTunes is the Trojan Horse 

    I am a Mac addict. There, I admit it. I’m also a technology nut. I love gadgets – anything with bells and whistles. I’m also interested in anything that can potentially enable me to be more productive and organized. The recent announcement of the iPhone brought out the same reaction I always have when Apple introduces something: “Wow, that is so cool! I have to have it!” Then I excitedly tell my wife how I need to have this new gadget, but she quickly brings me down to earth with statements like, “So, do you want your children to have the luxury of wearing diapers?” or “Have you considered how expensive college will be for our children when they can attend?” So, she brings me down to earth, rightfully so. However, that does not stop me from working hard to state my case. I’ve been resourceful in the past, but sometimes it’s hard when I have a wife who prefers Windows pcs over Macs, Pepsi over Coke. But I digress.

    The Genius of iTunes


    iTunes Trojan Horse

    So, why is iTunes a Trojan Horse? I do not mean that Apple has any malicious intent to use iTunes to harm our devices or the digital information we own. Rather, I believe iTunes is Apple’s most powerful weapon for selling more products, for expanding existing markets and for reaching new markets. How? Let’s look at a brief history of iTunes (see more here):

    1. January 09, 2001 – iTunes was originally released for managing music on an owner’s computer
    2. October 03, 2001 – iTunes integrates with the first iPod
    3. April 28, 2003 – iTunes Music Store support
    4. October 16, 2003 – iTunes for Windows
    5. October 27, 2004 – Supports photo sycing
    6. May 09, 2005 – Supports video syncing; supports calendar and contact syncing (Mac only)
    7. September 07, 2005 – iTunes can sync calendars and contacts with Microsoft Outlook

    The “video” capabilities have grown to include both television, movies, and other types of video. So, with each new version of iTunes, Apple extends its reach to manage new types of content, and it also makes this available for Mac and Windows users alike.

    The Sync is the Kitchen Sink

    Sync IconSure, the iTunes Store is important, because Apple wants you to purchase content from them. However, the sync ability is the most important feature of iTunes. Of course the end game for Apple is to entice people to buy their hardware and to purchase content from their store. But to truly entice users to spend money on either hardware or content, they have to have sync done right. How might this be done?

    Well, for one, sync needs to go two ways. Previously, sync meant updating your iPod with content from your desktop or laptop computer. Calendar and contact information was handled on the desktop or laptop, and then this content was updated on the iPod. With the introduction of the iPhone, however, we’re now talking about the ability to update content on either the device or the desktop/laptop, and have it update both ways. I applaud Apple for pursuing specific standards, particularly the CalDAV standard. For Apple to be successful, they will need to continue such efforts to pursue standards for two-way (or more) syncing all kinds of content.

    Recommendations

    I would recommend the following to happen for Apple to be successful:

    1. Change the “iTunes” name to something more encompassing to reflect the purpose of the application. Perhaps “iHub” or something that shows how many types of content can be held and synced using this application.
    2. Two-way content editing means that with the iPhone, I should be able to CRUD calendar or contact items on my phone, and then sync back to my desktop/laptop and vice versa.
    3. Web Syncing does not mean forcing people (including non Mac owners) to use the .Mac service. It means working with partners Google and Yahoo to come up with APIs or other webDAV solutions so content can be synced with external web applications. If Apple can handle two-way syncing with external web PDA-like solutions, then it will have won the game.

    Conclusion

    There is so much content the mobile user wants at their fingertips – music, video, calendar, contacts, etc. Apple’s iTunes application is rapidly becoming the hub that syncs and manages many types of content. For Apple to be even more successful, iTunes must be renamed and it must handle two-way (or more) syncing between device(s), web application(s) and/or desktop/laptop application(s).

    Tags: [, , , , , , , , , , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 6:28 am on 3/24/2006 Permalink  

    XP on a Mac 

    Joy of Tech - XP on a Mac

    Well, it looks like there’s a relatively stable way to get Microsoft and Apple to play together on a Mac. Have you been successful?

    Tags: [, , , , , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 7:27 am on 2/1/2006 Permalink  

    Best Buy Offering Windows OS on Apple Powerbooks 

    Apple Windows

    It looks as though Best Buy is offering Apple Powerbooks with what looks like the Windows 98 OS! This post may get a lot of traffic, so let me stop the speculation now by saying that Best Buy is NOT offering Powerbooks with Windows. BB simply needs to work on their Photoshopping skills.

    Product here and expanded image here.
    Hat Tip to Durden2.0.

    Tags: [, , , , , , , , , , ]

     
    • Jason 5:58 pm on 2/2/2006 Permalink

      Maybe they are running Virtual PC with a Win98 install. ;) Because we all know that running Win98, in Virtual PC and on a Powerbook none the less, is just kick ass!!

  • Rob Fay 12:49 pm on 11/18/2005 Permalink  

    More Mac Incompatibility with Grants.gov 

    Back in April I discussed how the federal government is discriminating against Macintosh users with regard to e-gov business transactions with the grantee community. I still cannot believe that OMB chose a solution that disregards a significant segment of its community. Furthermore, I find it hard to trust a vender who cannot implement a quick solution to cross-platform compatibility issues, particularly now that we live in an era that relies less on any given computing platform in favor of open-standards web services. Anyway, here is the latest word on Mac compatibility with Grants.gov:

    I have heard that Grants.gov is not Macintosh compatible. What do I do if I use only a Macintosh?
    Grants.gov is aware of the issues facing Macintosh users who apply for Federal grants electronically. Grants.gov has provided the following response regarding this issue on the FAQ page of their website:

    “Grants.gov has been working with PureEdge [since acquired by IBM and renamed IBM® Workplace Forms™] to offer a viewer that is compatible with as many operating systems as possible. Once a MAC compatible viewer has been developed information will be posted on our website. Our goal is to ensure the widest possible acceptance of Grants.gov and not exclude anyone from the electronic grants submission process.”

    Pure Edge anticipates having a platform independent solution available by November 2006. Until then, PC emulation software for the Mac will allow Macintosh users to prepare and submit their applications to Grants.gov. Grants.gov has provided information [PDF] on using the PureEdge viewer with a Mac.

    Grants.gov and NIH are partnering to provide free access to Citrix servers for Macintosh Users who are looking for an alternative to using PC emulation software with the PureEdge™ forms. This service will be available for use at the end of December 2005.

    A Citrix server connection allows Macintosh users to remotely launch a Windows session on their own machines by using the free Citrix client application. While connected to the server, Mac users can develop their grant application using PureEdge™ forms. Applicants will need to download and install the free Citrix client application in order to work on the SF424 (R&R) application package with the specific grant for which they are applying.

    While connected to the Citrix server, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR)/Signing Official (SO) can submit the application to NIH via Grants.gov.

    Applicants can also use service providers (see Service Providers) for a platform independent solution.

    Applicants having trouble submitting their application electronically to Grants.gov should contact Grant.gov customer support for assistance.

    Statement from OER Deputy Director regarding Macintosh compatibility:

    “We truly regret the inconvenience that Grants.gov’s lack of platform independence is causing Macintosh users. As stated in the FAQ’s posted on this website, the Office of Management and Budget, part of the Executive Office of the President, has chosen Grants.gov as the single portal for all submissions of federal grant applications, and NIH’s parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), as Grants.gov’s implementer. As the federal government’s largest research granting agency, NIH is expected to be a key player in the DHHS implementation of Grants.gov. We and others have made Grants.gov aware of the difficulties that Macintosh users are experiencing and are working with Grants.gov staff to implement a temporary solution (Citrix). We recognize that this solution is not ideal but ask for your patience and forbearance as we work toward the very complex task of electronic submission of all NIH applications by May 2007. Grants.gov is working with PureEdge toward a platform independent solution by November of 2006. For additional information about Grants.gov please visit their website at http://www.grants.gov.”;

    - Norka Ruiz Bravo, NIH Deputy Director of Extramural Research

    Tags: [, , , , , , , , , , , ]

     
    • Thom Hughes 1:18 pm on 12/8/2005 Permalink

      At first I too was concerned with the Mac compatability issue. Many of us in the scientific community use Macs, and it is hard to imagine why we would have to go out and by windows boxes just to submit grants. Well, I just used the grants.gov system for the first time to submit a grant, using a windows machine, and I have this to report. Don’t worry about the system not working on your mac. It doesn’t work on a windows machine either. It is truly the most wretched system I have ever had to struggle with. Who ever decided to use this system has single handedly set biomedical research back at least a year.

    • Rob Fay 1:50 pm on 12/8/2005 Permalink

      I’ve submitted a few grants.gov applications in the past, only because the university I worked at required approval and submission by the central administration instead of direct submission by the PIs.

      It’s wasn’t too painful, but it was not intuitive either. What I dislike is that you can only check preliminary submission status at grant.gov, then you must go to the agency to check the status of the application.

      I do understand part of the reason to use PureEdge. It allows for offline work to get necessary data elements into the proper XML format. The powers that be rightly knew that some persons may not always have constant (high speed) internet connectivity.

      On the other hand, a reliance on a proprietary product not available for all platforms seems preposterous to me.

      What is the lesser of two evils – requiring an internet connection or requiring the use of a proprietary product?

  • Rob Fay 10:35 pm on 8/11/2005 Permalink  

    The World Just Got Smaller… 

    Chatting with my father-in-law

    My father-in-law and I recently purchased a small video camera (iSight) that can be mounted onto the top of our Apple computers. The purpose of the camera is so that we can both see and hear each other remotely using a combination of the camera and “instant messenger” chatting software that most of us have already used. We had a great time – both video and audio were really good – not choppy like I anticipated it might be. The video was a little fuzzy, but only when I had it fill the entire screen. Nonetheless, it was amazing! I felt like we were sitting across the table from each other. In fact, during another “chat” I put the camera on my laptop, and leveraging the wireless connection in my home, I was able to take my laptop around the house so my father-in-law could see home improvements, etc. from his home hundreds of miles away. Amazing!

    Chatting with my father-in-law

    Anyway, I was hoping to lure friends and family into getting one of these. There are a few hurdles – you need a high speed internet connection (no dialup) and your computer must be relatively new (you do not have to have an Apple Macintosh). Think of all the long distance costs you will save because chatting this way is free – only the cost of the high speed internet service (and the camera)!

    This has been done in the business community for a while now for holding remote conference calls. For instance, CNN recently decided to use Apple’s technology to aid them in their efforts for real time remote reporting.

    The psychotherapy profession should really start embracing the use of this technology in order to provide alternative services. For instance, what if a psychotherapist needs to see a family, yet one of the parents happens to be away for business during a planned session. Typically, the appointment would either be cancelled or it might be missing an important viewpoint if the psychotherapist decided to see the reminder of the family anyway. A certain number of counselors already do therapy by telephone or by email, but I think there are 2 limitations with these laternatives. First, doing email “therapy” tends to lend itself more to helping one individual, not many at once. Second, it is common knowledge that a majority of communication occurs nonverbally, so much is lost using the mediums I mentioned. However, using relatively inexpensive webcam technology could be something the profession needs to consider. The major concerns would involve the legal (insurance), confidentiality, security, and archiving issues, but I think these could be reasonably resolved.

    Tags: [, , , , , , , , , , , ]

     
    • Arf 9:28 pm on 8/13/2005 Permalink

      You’ve got to be kidding me. Video conferencing is far from being a new technology, and you write like you’re one of the first to discover it. Maybe you’d like to share your thoughts on the wheel with the world too?

      By the way, the psychotherapy profession were using it and talking about it in 1996 (http://netpsych.com/netpsych2.htm) so you’re only 9+ years behind there.

    • Rob Fay 12:02 am on 8/14/2005 Permalink

      Arf:

      Thanks for your feedback. I do not disagree with you regarding my being late to the party, but I do disagree with you about how prevalent this technology is being used in the psychotherapy community. The technology may have been available and discussed in the psychotherapy community,but it is not necessarily being used widely.

    • Jason 2:24 pm on 8/15/2005 Permalink

      It sounds like somebody didn’t have their Wheaties this morning (Arf). I also find it funny that Arf calls you out on your site but doesn’t leave a way of rebuttal except in this forum.

      I think you have some good points Rob. I have thought about purchasing an iSight, but don’t have many friends that would purchase one as well. I do have plenty of friends that live abroad and having an iSight would be killer, but utilization is slim at best. $180 is a decent amount of cash to drop on something you’d only use maybe once a month.

    • Rob Fay 10:19 pm on 8/15/2005 Permalink

      Thanks, Jason. Of course the technology is not new, but I finally got around to getting it. Fortunately, my father-in-law got an educational discount, so it was more like $130 or so for me. Since my wife is preggo we thought we could use the techology for family to see the little ones from afar. I’m not much of a phone person, but I find I’m more likely to talk if I can see the person…

    • Jason 1:32 pm on 8/18/2005 Permalink

      The good ol’ “Education Discount.” With the cost of hardware and software today, it’s almost worth it to invest some cash into furthering ones education. The discounts you receive alone are worth the money put into an institution of higher learning.

      I concur on not being much of a phone person. I remember going to Epcot Center when I was a kid and seeing the AT&T display with the video phones. Having an iSight is so tempting. I think I may add it to my Amazon wish list and see what Santa brings this year.

    • Rob Fay 1:54 pm on 8/18/2005 Permalink

      The deals are on the software you can get via educational ties. When I was employed by the university, I got MS Office and Virtual PC for $10 because of a license agreement. Getting OS 10.4 for cheap wasn’t bad either.

  • Rob Fay 7:30 am on 8/2/2005 Permalink  

    Mighty Mouse 

    Apple finally updates its one button mouse

    Apple's New Mouse

    Tags: [, , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 9:51 pm on 7/21/2005 Permalink | Reply  

    No Scam Here – I Got the iBook! 

    Apple iBook

    The Hook

    I was incredibly skeptical, but now I’m a believer! For months I’ve wanted to get a laptop. Sure, it was not needed for work, but I thought it would be beneficial for a variety of reasons. First, I am a technophile, but I felt I could really use the laptop for grad school and I argued that I could spend more time with my wife (instead of being locked away in the home office, I could still do computer work in the convenience of the family room while my wife watched television). Unfortunately, my wife was not too keen on us spending >$1000 for my dream of having an Apple Computer laptop. She insisted that we could just get an inexpensive pc laptop like a Dell. Noooooo!

    Then I stumbled across an “internet marketing” promotion. You may be familiar with them – “get a free iPod by getting 6 of your friends to sign up and register for X.” This promotion, offered by the Internet Opinion Group, used a different business model that I agreed with. Instead of bugging friends and family to complete stupid tasks like signing up for a credit card, I took sole responsibility for being the sucker. Depending on the value of the desired gift, registrants are required to participate in purchasing up to 6 products and/or services in order to complete the business transaction. Think of it as an alternate method for consumer advertising.

    I was skeptical about whether or not the iBook would be new or used, but they promoted a 14″ iBook (or similar product) with the following specifications: iBook G4, 1 GHz processor, 256 MB RAM, OSX. I started my adventure by signing up on March 6, 2005.

    (More …)

     
    • Nomad 4:37 pm on 7/22/2005 Permalink

      Congratulations! If you are looking to upgrade the RAM, I would recommend checking out RamBus for cheap memory. They have the best deals on the Web, and upgrading an iBook’s memory is something easily done by most “technophiles.”

    • Nomad 4:43 pm on 7/22/2005 Permalink

      Oh, and for the free router, do not skimp. Buy an Airport or Airport Express. The others end to fail within a year’s time.

    • Nomad 9:01 pm on 7/22/2005 Permalink

    • Rob Fay 11:37 pm on 7/22/2005 Permalink

      Thanks for the advice, Nomad. I’ve been setting up the laptop all night and should get some sleep soon. I spent $100 tonight at Best Buy – $70 for a Linksys Wireless-G router ($30 mail in rebate makes it $40) and $30 for a firewire cable to quickly copy applications and files to the iBook.

      I had a wired Linksys for a while now and have had no problems. Cost may win out here.

      I like your idea about RAM, though. Apple charges $500 for 1GB, yet I’ve seen third party offerings for $200. I DEFINITELY need to get more RAM.

      Are you feeling better?

    • Rob Fay 11:42 pm on 7/22/2005 Permalink

      By the way, two other products I could use recommendations for:

      Portable mouse – have a recommendation for a corded mouse (possibly retractable) for the laptop?
      Wireless remote – I’m looking for a wireless remote that can control iTunes, Keynote, PowerPoint, etc. as well as include an integrated laser pointer

      Thanks!

    • ~Angel~ 10:13 am on 7/23/2005 Permalink

      I always thoughts those promotions were scams. Good to see you got your iBook…not bad for a couple of hundred dollars.

    • Nomad 10:41 am on 7/23/2005 Permalink

      The keyspan remove is the best way to go, if you want something that’ll work with all of your apps flawlessly. You can get the older model (identical to the new one, except for Airport Express compatibility) for about $30 on eBay.

      For the mouse… well… what are you looking for exactly. Any USB mouse will work with an iBook. I prefer the cordless models and there are many great Bluetooth models – if you have BT included. I’d recommend just browsing thru Staples to find the one that fits you best.

      And glad to hear the RamJet info helped. Another good cheap RAM-seller is http://www.transintl.com.

    • Rob Fay 8:22 pm on 7/23/2005 Permalink

      I see two keyspans on Amazon. Can the older, more inexpensive model control Keynote (I know it already can control PowerPoint)?

    • Nomad 12:39 pm on 7/24/2005 Permalink

      Yes, the Keyspan remotes handle Keynote just fine. Actually, they work just fine with ANY program. It is just not set up default on every program. You can always customize it for your needs.

    • Allen 7:57 pm on 10/16/2005 Permalink

      How do I get a free Ibook just likeyou without the hassel of scams, using credtcards and personal information like your birthday.

    • Rob Fay 9:42 am on 10/17/2005 Permalink

      Allen:

      I used the InternetOpinionGroup link and I was not scammed. The site simply gave me options to choose from and I had to select a certain amount of items/services to purchase. I purposefully chose not to enroll in a credit card, but for everything else, I only provided the personal information I’d normally provide when I make internet purchases.

      Let me know if you have any other questions.

    • Jason 11:55 pm on 10/20/2005 Permalink

      Congrats! I have a quick query for you. how long after your status said “shipped” did it take for you to actually get the laptop? I too am using IOG. Just curious, can’t wait.

    • Jason 11:57 pm on 10/20/2005 Permalink

      Portable mouse…i picked up a nice compusa brand wireless one with a usb receiver, is micro sized, and optical.

      about $20, both pc and mac compatible.

    • Rob Fay 7:41 am on 10/21/2005 Permalink

      Hey Jason. After the status was flagged as “shipped” it may have just been a few days – under a week.

      What was weird, however, was I was notified by UPS that I was to receive a package, but even though they offered a tracking option, it was pretty worthless. The status went from “transmitted info” to quickly showing status updates the very day the package arrived.

      Let me know if you have any other questions. What “gift” did you choose?

    • Jason 11:00 am on 10/21/2005 Permalink

      I went for the PSP. it seemed like a good idea at the time, but now i’m wishing i went for an ibook. oh well. maybe next time. with the offers i chose, i dont think i put more than $50 into it, though…and NO credit cards, they’re evil. :)

    • Rob Fay 12:35 pm on 10/21/2005 Permalink

      I agree – I avoided the credit card but had to suck it up for some products I didn’t like. I’m actually just about to cancel the Columbia House membership since I recently fulfilled my obligation.

      Enjoy!

    • Laurie 7:21 pm on 11/13/2005 Permalink

      I used the Internet Opionion Group, too. Everything you said about it is true. The only thing I was able to do differently is that I found a phone number for them. They were pretty helpful over the phone–much easier to deal with than the email option. I realized they just didn’t have very many reps, which is probably why it took them forever to answer email, if they got answered at all. I didn’t mind the things I had to purchase. It’s not like I was getting nothing for the things on which I was spending a little money. (I’m one of those people who’s actually enjoying that BMG music membership!)

      Anyway, I was pleasantly surprised when my copy of WinXP Pro with Service Pack 2 arrived (literally just in time to install into the new PC I had just built.) Because it’s a less expensive gift than some of the others, I only had to do 4 pretty inexpensive offers instead of the 6.

    • Laurie 7:22 pm on 11/13/2005 Permalink

      Oh, I almost forgot–if you use Internet Opionion Group and want to call them, the phone number is 801.316.0555, available 9-5 PST.

    • Rob Fay 7:45 am on 11/14/2005 Permalink

      Laurie:

      Thanks for the additional information! It’s good to know you too had a successful experience with the IOG.

    • Jon-Paul 2:21 pm on 12/6/2005 Permalink

      Rob…congrats (albeit late) on the iBook.

      I’m currently waiting for my Free Xbox 360 offers to go APPROVED. 2 of the 4 have. However, I still have not recieved a certificate email yet (which they claim will be sent within an hour). I’ve had to contact Customer Service (via phone – and on-line form). Phone service was great and very friendly. Form contact is slow.

      Another annoyance about IOG is that once you create your account and start clicking offers…there’s no way to get back to the offers if you didn’t complete all of them in one sitting. I had to walk through the sing-up process (with my same account info) to get back to the offers. Yes the site is a bit wonkey.

      Overall, I probably spent about $15 total (about $1 per trial offer) and I had one screw-up with the Trim-Life offer (didn’t know I had to cancel – so I got dinked shipping – although the refunded my subscription fee).

      I started my Process around late Oct and I’m sure I’ll be waiting till Jan/Feb for my product. I’m patient though. I can wait.

      I’ll have to post my experience when I’m done with mine.

      Thanks for a great post.

    • Louis 6:49 pm on 12/9/2005 Permalink

      Just went through the IOG survey wondering if I was opening myself to a big scam. This is why I am here now to allay my fears. I have emailed twice to confirm that I am on record after completing 6 purchases through their site. I find it strange that I signed up for all of these offers and the vendors have responded and charged me but I haven’t received a response from IOG to set up my account.
      Your BLOG got me the info I needed (a phone number). I just finished talking with CS staff and they had my info on file and setup password/account for me. So now it is wait and see.
      Thank you for posting this info.

    • nice ibook 8:07 pm on 12/22/2005 Permalink

      This actually works. I received my Ibook today.

    • dianne 1:54 pm on 1/5/2006 Permalink

      I have had the worst time on this thing. I answered the same questions several times! What is the deal. I even received a call from one of the vendors while still answering the same questions over and over. Anyone else have any suggestions?

    • Rob Fay 2:26 pm on 1/5/2006 Permalink

      What questions did you need to answer? I’m confused…

    • ernie 9:07 am on 3/6/2006 Permalink

      can i cancel when it says “in progress?” or do i have to wait until it says “approved”?

    • PAUL 1:41 pm on 3/22/2006 Permalink

      Started my process March 12, 05 had many, many flaws generated from system, I didn’t attempt to get it resolved due to life/death happening, until June. I was advised to complete more offers. Finally got all of my certs January 12th. Received my iBook 12″ 1.33 gig yesterday. I does work, be patient.

    • Lee 5:03 pm on 4/20/2006 Permalink

      Rob-
      I really wanted to get a 12′ powerbook and did a google search on free apple powerbook and found ‘samplepromotionsgroup.com’ …Do you know anything about this site?..is there another site that you know of where peple compare notes on these sites?..I’d thought of giving this a shot, but, like you, I dont want to involve anyone else i.e. getting others to sign up for credit cards, etc…and it seems samplepromotionsgroup.com doesnt lay it out it if you have to involve others until youre well into the process..thanks

    • robert 7:27 pm on 1/25/2007 Permalink

      how can i get a free laptop with no scams
      i need one for school but can’t afford one

    • Rob Fay 7:47 pm on 1/25/2007 Permalink

      Robert,

      Nothing is ever free. You have to do your homework. The iBook experience worked for me because I determined that I would have to pay – but $250 or less (and waiting close to 6 months) is still better than paying $1000.

      On the other hand, I saw another promotion recently that I looked into offering a MacBook Pro and a digital camera. However, when I looked at the products and services, it would have cost me as much as buying the stuff on my own.

      Just do your homework. You can’t get anything for free, but this promotion did work for me.

  • Rob Fay 7:17 am on 7/7/2005 Permalink  

    Another Apple Rumor 

    Intel

    More Than Just the Chips?

    I thought I’d jump into the never-ending Apple rumor fray. BetaNews reports on July 6, 2005 that:

    “Intel announced that it is investing in a company called ClickStar with the intent to create a distribution system for films over the Internet before they are released to home video.”

    Is it just a coincidence that Intel and Apple are partnering to produce chips for upcoming Apple computers in 2006? Seems interesting to me that Apple already has a great vehicle for distributing content, which could easily include movies.

    Tags: [, , , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 12:25 pm on 6/10/2005 Permalink  

    Search, Folders, and the Need For Automated “Smart” Tagging 

    The End of Folders? Nope.

    I recently read related posts on Dan Brown’s Green Onions and Brad Hill’s Unofficial Google Weblog regarding the buzz about the supposed demise of “folders” on personal computers. Dan discusses this buzz – that people may be moving away from classifying electronic information based on a hierarchical “folder” framework, instead complementing this habit by applying the concept of attributing “labels” (often more than one) to this information. Dan appears not to buy into this theory, instead arguing that the the concept of folders (or a hierarchical structure of organization on personal computers) may not become obsolete because the “human mind loves part-whole organization.” I agree.

    I cannot imagine a world without folders. Folders make my world a bit smaller and more manageable – a starting point, if you will. If I had to rely solely on a search mechanism I might very well be in trouble because sometimes I just cannot think of the correct meta-information to locate what I’m looking for. Since I am a visual person, I often need a visual cue to get me started on my quest. I can often define my specific search strategy only after I have seen the top one of two tiers of folders on my computer’s file system. Unfortunately, while search tools are doing a better job locating information based on meta-information, there is still a gap. Let me explain…

    (More …)

     
  • Rob Fay 7:38 am on 6/7/2005 Permalink  

    The Sky is Falling, the Sky is Falling! 

    It must be the end of the world as we know it:

    IntelIt’s official: Apple shifting to Intel chips

    “Macintosh computers using Intel Corp. chips will be on the market by this time next year, with all Apple Macs moved over to Intel chips by the end of 2007, Apple Computer Inc. CEO Steve Jobs announced today at the company’s Worldwide Developer Conference in San Francisco.”

    Tags: [, , , ]

     
  • Rob Fay 9:32 pm on 4/21/2005 Permalink | Reply  

    Fair Access, Security, and Innovation 

    I came across a blog posting today with the title, “Federal Government Discriminates against Mac Users.” The author, a federally funded research professor, was finding difficulty applying for federal funding because he had to use the PureEdge Viewer to submit his application for grant funding to the Grants.gov site. His problem is that he is a Mac user and Macs are only supported if you don’t mind using a pc simulation program such as Virtual PC. I’ve used VPC, but IMHO it has not proven to be a viable solution for Mac users, particularly for something as important as conducting business with the federal government. Some Mac users have previously voiced their concerns at places such as the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP).

    So, the question is, why does this federal site, which has the authority for consolidating the business of grant funding among a majority of federal agencies, have the authority to mandate a technology that can only be used by users of one operating system? There are federal mandates such as Section 508 that provide for equal access to web applications for handicapped individuals. Shouldn’t there be an equal access technology policy too?
    (More …)

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel