<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Anti-Google&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/</link>
	<description>UX Architect @ Blackboard. UX / IA / IxD / Usability junkie. NY Yankee Fan. UConn Husky fan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad</title>
		<link>http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robfay.com/2005/07/29/the-anti-google/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it make more sense (from a human nature standpoint) to use a Google-type conceptual mapping system to be able to know that certain other words are associated with a given topic?  For example, it would &quot;know&quot; (from spidering and mining the web) that &quot;Apple&quot; and &quot;MP3&quot; and &quot;DRM&quot; are all commonly associated with iPod and be able to automatically put up additional tags.  This allows humans to be &quot;selfish&quot; without putting the onus on the human.

Similarly, if the posting lacks all of the common words that are known about, it would be an indication in the pagerank that it is a tag in bad faith or of a personal vocabulary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it make more sense (from a human nature standpoint) to use a Google-type conceptual mapping system to be able to know that certain other words are associated with a given topic?  For example, it would &#8220;know&#8221; (from spidering and mining the web) that &#8220;Apple&#8221; and &#8220;MP3&#8243; and &#8220;DRM&#8221; are all commonly associated with iPod and be able to automatically put up additional tags.  This allows humans to be &#8220;selfish&#8221; without putting the onus on the human.</p>
<p>Similarly, if the posting lacks all of the common words that are known about, it would be an indication in the pagerank that it is a tag in bad faith or of a personal vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Fay</title>
		<link>http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robfay.com/2005/07/29/the-anti-google/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Mike-

Thanks for your feedback (and the plug for your site - I&#039;ll check it out when I get a chance).  I&#039;m sure Google will move this way, but I believe the phrase meant to capture the fact that Google&#039;s search tool is used to retrieve what persons are looking for, not what they are not necessarily looking for.  The Long-Tail discussion points to the fact that gems can be found in unlikely places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike-</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback (and the plug for your site &#8211; I&#8217;ll check it out when I get a chance).  I&#8217;m sure Google will move this way, but I believe the phrase meant to capture the fact that Google&#8217;s search tool is used to retrieve what persons are looking for, not what they are not necessarily looking for.  The Long-Tail discussion points to the fact that gems can be found in unlikely places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robfay.com/2005/07/29/the-anti-google/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Very interesting comment.  However, I am not sure if this is really &quot;Anti Google&quot; or if Google will just embrace this trend just like Yahoo! is attempting to do with MyWeb2.0.  

I agree with your comment that folksonomies are going to have a very significant impact on the way people store, share, and discovery new information.  Plus, tagging is very selfish and still works.  Lots of people want to use multiple tags just to make finding and retrieving their information much easier going forward.  After all, lots of things are associated with different mental notes (i.e. tags).

Given your interest, I tought you might be interested in checking out our site (www.blinklist.com).  Would love to hear from you if you have a chance to check it out.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting comment.  However, I am not sure if this is really &#8220;Anti Google&#8221; or if Google will just embrace this trend just like Yahoo! is attempting to do with MyWeb2.0.  </p>
<p>I agree with your comment that folksonomies are going to have a very significant impact on the way people store, share, and discovery new information.  Plus, tagging is very selfish and still works.  Lots of people want to use multiple tags just to make finding and retrieving their information much easier going forward.  After all, lots of things are associated with different mental notes (i.e. tags).</p>
<p>Given your interest, I tought you might be interested in checking out our site (www.blinklist.com).  Would love to hear from you if you have a chance to check it out.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Fay</title>
		<link>http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robfay.com/2005/07/29/the-anti-google/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Alex.  I think I&#039;ve bookmarked that site somewhere, but I just haven&#039;t had the time to check it out.  I&#039;ll be sure to visit it.  By the way, any success with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetopiniongroup.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IOG&lt;/a&gt; thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Alex.  I think I&#8217;ve bookmarked that site somewhere, but I just haven&#8217;t had the time to check it out.  I&#8217;ll be sure to visit it.  By the way, any success with the <a href="http://www.internetopiniongroup.com" rel="nofollow">IOG</a> thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.robfay.com/2005/07/28/the-anti-google/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robfay.com/2005/07/29/the-anti-google/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Regarding tagging as the &quot;anti-google,&quot; check out Yahoo&#039;s My Web 2.0 at myweb2.search.yahoo.com.. I can&#039;t imagine google is too far behind.. I&#039;d be interested in seeing some sort of hybrid tagging+pagerank search tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding tagging as the &#8220;anti-google,&#8221; check out Yahoo&#8217;s My Web 2.0 at myweb2.search.yahoo.com.. I can&#8217;t imagine google is too far behind.. I&#8217;d be interested in seeing some sort of hybrid tagging+pagerank search tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

